In other news...
Jun. 8th, 2009 11:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...the DPRK just sentenced Laura Ling and Euna Lee to 12 years of hard labor.
Anyone who cares to know what this means might want to take a look at these books.
Also, Jesus. My thoughts are with Ling, Lee, and their families.
That will be all.
Anyone who cares to know what this means might want to take a look at these books.
Also, Jesus. My thoughts are with Ling, Lee, and their families.
That will be all.
no subject
on 2009-06-08 04:31 pm (UTC)"The sentence doesn't mean much because the issue will be resolved diplomatically in the end," Kim said.
Dear God, I certainly hope so.
no subject
on 2009-06-09 11:40 am (UTC)Personally, I'm a bit skeptical. North Korea's main concern now is with building up legitimacy for Kim Jong-un's
reignleadershipreign, and refusing to repatriate two American citizens? Might be one way they plan on showing that they've got Colbert-sized balls. (o.o);;no subject
on 2009-06-11 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-06-12 01:10 am (UTC)I mean, there isn't anything we can give them that they *want* (aside from bilateral relations, and that's a nightmare not worth thinking about).
no subject
on 2009-06-13 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-06-11 11:15 pm (UTC)Let's bomb the crap out of North Korea! Never mind the fact that we don't have spare military, we're down 13,000 soldiers due to "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", despite recruiting felons, and we're over budget and in hoc up to our saucer sized nipples to the neighbors to the East. We have to start bombing and get our girls home!
I feel better now!
no subject
on 2009-06-12 01:08 am (UTC)I don't think it's any accident that North Korea has rachetted up the beligerence since Bush took office--they know we can't respond as effectively as we once could.
no subject
on 2009-06-13 12:30 am (UTC)But I'm not sure anymore that bombing and invading are good ideas, for any reason. It's too much of a chainsaw when a scalpel is necessary. And coldly logical, two women aren't worth the collateral damage of my pretend Republican scenerio.
no subject
on 2009-08-13 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-08-14 12:09 am (UTC)If anyone would randomly read some of the comments on this thread, they'd think I was a douche. I feel like a douche just repeating it. How long of a shower does Steven Colbert have to take every night just joking about the neocon point of view?
no subject
on 2009-08-14 01:57 am (UTC)Yeah, it's the difference between the way you talk to someone you've known since before puberty versus how it sounds to some random stranger just surfing in off the net.^^
I'd shower in Stephen Colbert for as long as he'd let me.
no subject
on 2009-08-19 12:10 am (UTC)I think our politicians should shut the fuck up and they should put Jon Stewart on the stump for health care reform. He's doing a better job refuting the right wing crazies than the president is.
no subject
on 2009-08-22 01:01 pm (UTC)And sweet puppy-eyed Jesus, did you see Stewart's takedown of that "death panel" idiot McCaughey? That woman is the living embodiment of what it means to be a tool, and Jon Stewart is a saint for actually interviewing her. I would have started punching her in the face and never stopping within the first two minutes of her bullshit.
no subject
on 2009-08-25 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-08-29 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-09-03 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-09-10 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-09-10 11:09 pm (UTC)Monday though, I desperately want to see if Jon Stuart catches that Obama used his arguement in the congress to speech.
no subject
on 2009-09-11 10:46 am (UTC)Dude, you're not Stewie and you're not Jon Stewart; you're a 50-year-old-man who built his image on being the next Edward Murrow and you are just hanging your ass out the window when you try to be the former.
I think Stewart will be on to Obama. Question is, in what way will he make his "told you so" funny?
no subject
on 2009-09-15 09:31 pm (UTC)Cable news as a whole disappoints me, since it's all infotainment. Most are either ideologues or trying so hard to appear inpartial that they can't ask an obvious question. "I might hurt his feelings." Rachel's good but sometimes she bores me. Keith is good but sometimes he's really not funny and it comes off as sad. and I feel like he's just as bad as fox some days when it comes to pure partisanism. (J. Garrafalo should never ever be on a news show.) Everyone else is just a blow hard. I just want some news dammit.
I actually was disappointed. He showed the clip where Obama made his point for him, but they spent so much time making fun of Joe Wilson that he didn't have time for an I told you so.
no subject
on 2009-09-26 02:09 pm (UTC)Amen on the news. It's one of the things I think NHK does really well--presenting facts with a minimum of bias (at least in 90% of cases). If we're talking the American news media, then I think Rachel is by far the best. But I'm a wonk at heart so she'd have to try very, very, very hard to bore me. Keith needs to realise that humor is not his strong point, nor is he Stewie, and just going back to being an overly serious blowhard.
And oh, Joe Wilson. I had a reeaalllly freaking hard time trying to explain that one to the Japanese people I know...
no subject
on 2009-09-29 08:58 pm (UTC)I bet. I'd be interested in knowing exactly how you explained it, cause I'm at a lose myself. I understand why he didn't apoligize to the House...he'd lose too many campaign donations. That's Politics 101. But the rest is mindboggling.
Anyway, screw decorum. I want a royal rumble match on the senate floor. Maybe then the goddamn liberals would be forced to have some balls and throw a literal punch or two.
either that or open primaries. but I like the WWE solution.