![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
TWIB-III: 39 (7/13-7/19)
Surpringly, I managed to read two books during the final week leading up to the Hell Thesis deadline, both of them extremely good. They are:
Fatal Light - Richard Currey
Two comments about Fatal Light: 1) This may be the best war novel I have ever read; 2) People who criticize this novel for its paucity of main character description (to say nothing of development) are missing the point. A corollary: The second point is directly responsible for the first.
1) Fatal Light's plot is the plot of every war novel you've ever read: a young man, innocent and full of dreams is changed by the brutality he experiences fighting a war in a far off land. The difference here is that Currey's narrator is barely there; as do all war novel protagonists, he speaks of his childhood, his first love, his fellow soldiers, his experiences on the battlefield, on leave, in the hospital, but with little attempt to provide back story or narrative continuity. Currey's protagonist is essentially narrating this story to himself, which means there's no need for him to fill in the particulars because he already knows them fully well.
But we readers, of course, cannot know this information, with the end result that it is simply not provided. In most novels, this would be the kiss of death. Here, it is what makes Fatal Light extraordinary. Why? Because any war novel with a defined protagonist is as much about the protagonist as it is the war it's set in--what happened to the protagonist, how the protagonist's friend Johnny XYZ did or didn't pull through, if the protagonist survived this or that battle, how his family reacted when he came home. It is precisely because Fatal Light's protagonist is barely there that the novel truly becomes about the Vietnam War and not just a few of the people to whom it happened.
The same can be said for the plot. Because there's so little emphasis on the main character, the plot is not about how one man was strong enough to overcome the odds or too sensitive to withstand the horror, it's about the horror of the war itself, the damage it causes to everyone and everything in its path, which is perhaps the truest depiction of war possible. Finally, Currey's prose is so beautiful and atmospheric it defies description. This is one of the most powerful books I have read in quite some time. Read this book.
2) The Hunger Games - Suzanne Collins
Believe the hype. Believe all of the hype you have read about this book. It really is That Good. Collins is one of the few young readers/young adult authors who can actually write about violence and psychological horror in such a way that it's appropriate reading for ten-year-olds but doesn't insult their intelligence either. Her prose appears simple and straightforward at first glance, but there is a lot going on under the surface; indeed, one of the reasons it appears so simple is because Collins trusts readers to make connections and extrapolate motivations and emotions on their own, instead of holding their hands to make sure they're understanding everything correctly.
Not only does The Hunger Games rise above its potentially ho-hum premise (namely: what if reality shows like Survivor were actually played for life-and-death stakes), but it does so while rarely resorting to the deus-ex-machina and happy coincidences on which so many other authors depend to move their stories forward. This is one of the most tightly plotted novels I have read in quite some time, and its narrative development rarely strains credibility. And then there is Katniss, the protagonist and narrator of the novel. I cannot put my love for this protagonist into words. Far from being some ineffective disney princess, Katniss is tough, resourceful, doesn't put a premium on being fashionable or "nice" (or secretly wish in her heart of hearts that she was either of those things), and who spends a fair portion of the novel helping the knight in distress. Better yet, it's entirely believable; Katniss is neither superhumanly gifted nor written to some misguided idea of a "feminist protagonist" checklist. She is a supremely natural and sympathetic character.
The world needs more fiction like this. Go read this book.
That will be all.
Fatal Light - Richard Currey
Two comments about Fatal Light: 1) This may be the best war novel I have ever read; 2) People who criticize this novel for its paucity of main character description (to say nothing of development) are missing the point. A corollary: The second point is directly responsible for the first.
1) Fatal Light's plot is the plot of every war novel you've ever read: a young man, innocent and full of dreams is changed by the brutality he experiences fighting a war in a far off land. The difference here is that Currey's narrator is barely there; as do all war novel protagonists, he speaks of his childhood, his first love, his fellow soldiers, his experiences on the battlefield, on leave, in the hospital, but with little attempt to provide back story or narrative continuity. Currey's protagonist is essentially narrating this story to himself, which means there's no need for him to fill in the particulars because he already knows them fully well.
But we readers, of course, cannot know this information, with the end result that it is simply not provided. In most novels, this would be the kiss of death. Here, it is what makes Fatal Light extraordinary. Why? Because any war novel with a defined protagonist is as much about the protagonist as it is the war it's set in--what happened to the protagonist, how the protagonist's friend Johnny XYZ did or didn't pull through, if the protagonist survived this or that battle, how his family reacted when he came home. It is precisely because Fatal Light's protagonist is barely there that the novel truly becomes about the Vietnam War and not just a few of the people to whom it happened.
The same can be said for the plot. Because there's so little emphasis on the main character, the plot is not about how one man was strong enough to overcome the odds or too sensitive to withstand the horror, it's about the horror of the war itself, the damage it causes to everyone and everything in its path, which is perhaps the truest depiction of war possible. Finally, Currey's prose is so beautiful and atmospheric it defies description. This is one of the most powerful books I have read in quite some time. Read this book.
2) The Hunger Games - Suzanne Collins
Believe the hype. Believe all of the hype you have read about this book. It really is That Good. Collins is one of the few young readers/young adult authors who can actually write about violence and psychological horror in such a way that it's appropriate reading for ten-year-olds but doesn't insult their intelligence either. Her prose appears simple and straightforward at first glance, but there is a lot going on under the surface; indeed, one of the reasons it appears so simple is because Collins trusts readers to make connections and extrapolate motivations and emotions on their own, instead of holding their hands to make sure they're understanding everything correctly.
Not only does The Hunger Games rise above its potentially ho-hum premise (namely: what if reality shows like Survivor were actually played for life-and-death stakes), but it does so while rarely resorting to the deus-ex-machina and happy coincidences on which so many other authors depend to move their stories forward. This is one of the most tightly plotted novels I have read in quite some time, and its narrative development rarely strains credibility. And then there is Katniss, the protagonist and narrator of the novel. I cannot put my love for this protagonist into words. Far from being some ineffective disney princess, Katniss is tough, resourceful, doesn't put a premium on being fashionable or "nice" (or secretly wish in her heart of hearts that she was either of those things), and who spends a fair portion of the novel helping the knight in distress. Better yet, it's entirely believable; Katniss is neither superhumanly gifted nor written to some misguided idea of a "feminist protagonist" checklist. She is a supremely natural and sympathetic character.
The world needs more fiction like this. Go read this book.
That will be all.
Re: GLEE
I haven't read one of King's books in years. But his reveiws do almost always piss me off. He did an article on "dude fiction"(you know, the opposite of chick lit?) and what sticks is while he recommended Robert B. Parker as an action author, his advice to him was that the main character should "dump Susan and kill the dog." To me, some of the best books of the series stem from the things that King's ass find's boring.
But anyway, back to HG. I totally wasn't expecting everyone to come back as genetically reengineered zombies at the end. I actually had a little reservation up to that point because she hadn't been required to kill, and I thought that was kinda weak, but then throw in some monsters and I was happy.
Re: GLEE
Also, I tried searching for that King interview for a full ten minutes and my google-fu turned up nothing. Care to test those link-making skills again?
Right, and I don't think that's the last we're going to see of them, either. I wasn't expecting Kat to kill, not because I thought Collins was too much of a pantywaist to write such a thing, but because I was expecting her publishers to be too much of a pantywaist to allow her to do it. That said, I do think it would raise interesting moral question if Kat actually had to take someone out in hand-to-hand combat and not just drop a nest of deadly wasps on them. Only two more days till September!
Re: GLEE
do think it would raise interesting moral question if Kat actually had to take someone out in hand-to-hand combat and not just drop a nest of deadly wasps on them. Or if she would have sniped someone from afar, holding thier head in her crosshairs.
In the Gregor books, without spoiling anything, there are points in the later books where Gregor is forced to kill, or needs to kill, and he spends a lot of time thinking about it. It's not like it's something he just does, even though given the story arc, he probably could have just glossed over it. That's one of the things I liked about his character and the stories Collins was telling.
The WCPL gives away a monthly magazine called bookpage, and this magically delicious interview was in it.. Awesome.
Re: GLEE